Epidemiology, etiology and treatment of female vaginal injury | Reproductive Health
Bronselaer G, Callens N, De Sutter P, et al. Self-assessment of genital anatomy and sexual function within a Belgian, Dutch-speaking female population: a validation study. J Sex Med. 2013;10(12):3006–18.
Google Scholar
Wagner G, Ottesen B. Vaginal physiology during menstruation. Ann Intern Med. 1982;96(6 Pt 2):921–3.
Google Scholar
Alves ÁLL, Silva LBD, Filho BJA, et al. Operative vaginal delivery. Rev Bras Ginecol Obstet. 2023;45(7):422–34.
Google Scholar
Linhares IM, Summers PR, Larsen B, et al. Contemporary perspectives on vaginal pH and lactobacilli. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2011;204(2):120.e121-125.
Google Scholar
Palma PCR, Monteiro MVC, Ledesma MA, et al. Treatment of Anterior Vaginal Wall Prolapse Using Transvaginal Anterior Mesh With Apical Fixation: A Prospective Multicenter Study With up to 2 Years of Follow-up. Int Neurourol J. 2018;22(3):177–84.
Google Scholar
Krantz KE. The gross and microscopic anatomy of the human vagina. Ann N Y Acad Sci. 1959;83:89–104.
Google Scholar
Weijenborg PTM, Kluivers KB, Dessens AB, et al. Sexual functioning, sexual esteem, genital self-image and psychological and relational functioning in women with Mayer-Rokitansky-Küster-Hauser syndrome: a case-control study. Hum Reprod. 2019;34(9):1661–73.
Google Scholar
Smith LA, Price N, Simonite V, et al. Incidence of and risk factors for perineal trauma: a prospective observational study. BMC Pregnancy Childbirth. 2013;13:59.
Google Scholar
Ulhe SC, Acharya N, Vats A, et al. Study of Vulvovaginal Atrophy and Genitourinary Syndrome of Menopause and Its Impact on the Quality of Life of Postmenopausal Women in Central India. Cureus. 2024;16(2): e54802.
Google Scholar
Maseroli E, Vignozzi L. Testosterone and Vaginal Function. Sex Med Rev. 2020;8(3):379–92.
Google Scholar
Godha K, Tucker KM, Biehl C, et al. Human vaginal pH and microbiota: an update. Gynecol Endocrinol. 2018;34(6):451–5.
Google Scholar
Anderson DJ, Marathe J, Pudney J. The structure of the human vaginal stratum corneum and its role in immune defense. Am J Reprod Immunol. 2014;71(6):618–23.
Google Scholar
Lopez HN, Focseneanu MA, Merritt DF. Genital injuries acute evaluation and management. Best Pract Res Clin Obstet Gynaecol. 2018;48:28–39.
Google Scholar
ACOG Practice Bulletin No. 198: Prevention and Management of Obstetric Lacerations at Vaginal Delivery. Obstet Gynecol. 2018;132(3):e87–102.
Google Scholar
Rogers R G, Leeman L M, Borders N, et al. Contribution of the second stage of labour to pelvic floor dysfunction: a prospective cohort comparison of nulliparous women . Bjog, 2014, 121(9): 1145-1153; discussion 1154.
Vale de Castro Monteiro M, Pereira G M, Aguiar R A, et al. Risk factors for severe obstetric perineal lacerations . Int Urogynecol J, 2016, 27(1): 61-67.
Myrick TG, Sandri KJ. Epidural Analgesia and Any Vaginal Laceration. J Am Board Fam Med. 2018;31(5):768–73.
Google Scholar
Abedzadeh-Kalahroudi M, Talebian A, Sadat Z, et al. Perineal trauma: incidence and its risk factors. J Obstet Gynaecol. 2019;39(2):206–11.
Google Scholar
Gommesen D, Nohr EA, Drue HC, et al. Obstetric perineal tears: risk factors, wound infection and dehiscence: a prospective cohort study. Arch Gynecol Obstet. 2019;300(1):67–77.
Google Scholar
Borello-France D, Burgio KL, Richter HE, et al. Fecal and urinary incontinence in primiparous women. Obstet Gynecol. 2006;108(4):863–72.
Google Scholar
Huber M, Tunón K, Lindqvist M. “From hell to healed” – A qualitative study on women’s experience of recovery, relationships and sexuality after severe obstetric perineal injury. Sex Reprod Healthc. 2022;33: 100736.
Google Scholar
Ngongo CJ, Raassen T, Lombard L, et al. Delivery mode for prolonged, obstructed labour resulting in obstetric fistula: a retrospective review of 4396 women in East and Central Africa. Bjog. 2020;127(6):702–7.
Google Scholar
Fujisaki A, Kinjo M, Shimoinaba M, et al. An evaluation of the impact of post-hysterectomy vesicovaginal fistula repair on the mental health of patients in a developed country. Int Urogynecol J. 2020;31(7):1371–5.
Google Scholar
Wall LL. Obstetric vesicovaginal fistula as an international public-health problem. Lancet. 2006;368(9542):1201–9.
Google Scholar
Das B, Snyder M. Rectovaginal Fistulae. Clin Colon Rectal Surg. 2016;29(1):50–6.
Google Scholar
Dawes AJ, Jensen CC. Rectovaginal Fistulas Secondary to Obstetrical Injury. Clin Colon Rectal Surg. 2021;34(1):28–39.
Google Scholar
Ryoo SB, Oh HK, Ha HK, et al. Outcomes of surgical treatments for rectovaginal fistula and prognostic factors for successful closure: a single-center tertiary hospital experiences. Ann Surg Treat Res. 2019;97(3):149–56.
Google Scholar
Shrestha DB, Budhathoki P, Karki P, et al. Vesico-Vaginal Fistula in Females in 2010–2020: a Systemic Review and Meta-analysis. Reprod Sci. 2022;29(12):3346–64.
Google Scholar
Jones IS, O’Connor A. Non-obstetric vulval trauma. Emerg Med Australas. 2013;25(1):36–9.
Google Scholar
Saxena AK, Steiner M, Höllwarth ME. Straddle injuries in female children and adolescents: 10-year accident and management analysis. Indian J Pediatr. 2014;81(8):766–9.
Google Scholar
Abraham M, Kondis J, Merritt DF. Case Series: Vaginal Rupture Injuries after Sexual Assault in Children and Adolescents. J Pediatr Adolesc Gynecol. 2016;29(3):e49-52.
Google Scholar
Hofsjö A, Bohm-Starke N, Blomgren B, et al. Radiotherapy-induced vaginal fibrosis in cervical cancer survivors. Acta Oncol. 2017;56(5):661–6.
Google Scholar
Abdelmonem AM. Vaginal length and incidence of dyspareunia after total abdominal versus vaginal hysterectomy. Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol. 2010;151(2):190–2.
Google Scholar
Jensen PT, Groenvold M, Klee MC, et al. Early-stage cervical carcinoma, radical hysterectomy, and sexual function. A longitudinal study Cancer. 2004;100(1):97–106.
Google Scholar
Bhatia R, Lichter KE, Gurram L, et al. The state of gynecologic radiation therapy in low- and middle-income countries. Int J Gynecol Cancer. 2022;32(3):421–8.
Google Scholar
van den Heerik A, Horeweg N, Creutzberg CL, et al. Vaginal brachytherapy management of stage I and II endometrial cancer. Int J Gynecol Cancer. 2022;32(3):304–10.
Google Scholar
Hofsjö A, Bergmark K, Blomgren B, et al. Radiotherapy for cervical cancer – impact on the vaginal epithelium and sexual function. Acta Oncol. 2018;57(3):338–45.
Google Scholar
Sorbe B, Straumits A, Karlsson L. Intravaginal high-dose-rate brachytherapy for stage I endometrial cancer: a randomized study of two dose-per-fraction levels. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys. 2005;62(5):1385–9.
Google Scholar
Aguilera MDV, Rovirosa Á, Ascaso C, et al. Late G2 vagina toxicity in post-operative endometrial carcinoma is associated with a 68 Gy dose equivalent to 2 Gy per fraction((α/β=3Gy)) at 2 cm(3) of vagina. J Contemp Brachytherapy. 2018;10(1):40–6.
Google Scholar
Akbaba S, Oelmann-Avendano JT, Krug D, et al. The impact of vaginal dilator use on vaginal stenosis and sexual quality of life in women treated with adjuvant radiotherapy for endometrial cancer. Strahlenther Onkol. 2019;195(10):902–12.
Google Scholar
Damast S, Jeffery DD, Son CH, et al. Literature Review of Vaginal Stenosis and Dilator Use in Radiation Oncology. Pract Radiat Oncol. 2019;9(6):479–91.
Google Scholar
Bahng AY, Dagan A, Bruner DW, et al. Determination of prognostic factors for vaginal mucosal toxicity associated with intravaginal high-dose rate brachytherapy in patients with endometrial cancer. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys. 2012;82(2):667–73.
Google Scholar
Kirchheiner K, Nout RA, Lindegaard JC, et al. Dose-effect relationship and risk factors for vaginal stenosis after definitive radio(chemo)therapy with image-guided brachytherapy for locally advanced cervical cancer in the EMBRACE study. Radiother Oncol. 2016;118(1):160–6.
Google Scholar
Varytė G, Bartkevičienė D. Pelvic Radiation Therapy Induced Vaginal Stenosis: A Review of Current Modalities and Recent Treatment Advances . Medicina (Kaunas), 2021, 57(4).
Jia AY, Viswanathan AN. Vaginal necrosis: A rare late toxicity after radiation therapy. Gynecol Oncol. 2021;160(2):602–9.
Google Scholar
Liang C, Liu P, Kang S, et al. Risk factors for and delayed recognition of genitourinary fistula following radical hysterectomy for cervical cancer: a population-based analysis. J Gynecol Oncol. 2023;34(2): e20.
Google Scholar
Liang C, Liu P, Cui Z, et al. Effect of laparoscopic versus abdominal radical hysterectomy on major surgical complications in women with stage IA-IIB cervical cancer in China, 2004–2015. Gynecol Oncol. 2020;156(1):115–23.
Google Scholar
Likic IS, Kadija S, Ladjevic NG, et al. Analysis of urologic complications after radical hysterectomy. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2008;199(6):644.e641-643.
Google Scholar
Chong GO, Park NY, Hong DG, et al. Learning curve of laparoscopic radical hysterectomy with pelvic and/or para-aortic lymphadenectomy in the early and locally advanced cervical cancer: comparison of the first 50 and second 50 cases. Int J Gynecol Cancer. 2009;19(8):1459–64.
Google Scholar
Hwang JH, Lim MC, Joung JY, et al. Urologic complications of laparoscopic radical hysterectomy and lymphadenectomy. Int Urogynecol J. 2012;23(11):1605–11.
Google Scholar
Sharp HT, Adelman MR. Prevention, Recognition, and Management of Urologic Injuries During Gynecologic Surgery. Obstet Gynecol. 2016;127(6):1085–96.
Google Scholar
Bretschneider CE, Casas-Puig V, Sheyn D, et al. Delayed recognition of lower urinary tract injuries following hysterectomy for benign indications: A NSQIP-based study. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2019;221(2):132.e131-132.e113.
Google Scholar
Liu P, Liang C, Lu A, et al. Risk factors and long-term impact of urologic complications during radical hysterectomy for cervical cancer in China, 2004–2016. Gynecol Oncol. 2020;158(2):294–302.
Google Scholar
Zhang N, Qin X, Zhang J, et al. Bone Marrow Mesenchymal Stem Cells Accelerate the Morphological and Functional Recovery of Neovaginas. Artif Organs. 2018;42(12):1206–15.
Google Scholar
Herlin MK, Petersen MB, Brännström M. Mayer-Rokitansky-Küster-Hauser (MRKH) syndrome: a comprehensive update. Orphanet J Rare Dis. 2020;15(1):214.
Google Scholar
Herlin M, Bjørn AM, Rasmussen M, et al. Prevalence and patient characteristics of Mayer-Rokitansky-Küster-Hauser syndrome: a nationwide registry-based study. Hum Reprod. 2016;31(10):2384–90.
Google Scholar
Tsitoura A, Michala L. The Sexuality of Adolescents and Young Women With MRKH Syndrome: A Qualitative Study. J Sex Med. 2021;18(12):2012–9.
Google Scholar
AmiesOelschlager AM, Kirby A, Breech L. Evaluation and management of vaginoplasty complications. Curr Opin Obstet Gynecol. 2017;29(5):316–21.
Google Scholar
Davies MC, Creighton SM, Woodhouse CR. The pitfalls of vaginal construction. BJU Int. 2005;95(9):1293–8.
Google Scholar
Wang H, Lau HH, Su TH. Single-incision mesh repair for the treatment of neovaginal prolapse. Taiwan J Obstet Gynecol. 2014;53(3):417–9.
Google Scholar
Louden ED, Awonuga AO, Gago LA, et al. Rare Müllerian Anomaly: Complete Septate Uterus with Simultaneous Longitudinal and Transverse Vaginal Septa. J Pediatr Adolesc Gynecol. 2015;28(6):e189-191.
Google Scholar
Nygaard I, Barber MD, Burgio KL, et al. Prevalence of symptomatic pelvic floor disorders in US women. Jama. 2008;300(11):1311–6.
Google Scholar
Weber MA, Kleijn MH, Langendam M, et al. Local Oestrogen for Pelvic Floor Disorders: A Systematic Review. PLoS One. 2015;10(9): e0136265.
Google Scholar
Bray R, Derpapas A, Fernando R, et al. Does the vaginal wall become thinner as prolapse grade increases? Int Urogynecol J. 2017;28(3):397–402.
Google Scholar
Knight KM, Moalli PA, Nolfi A, et al. Impact of parity on ewe vaginal mechanical properties relative to the nonhuman primate and rodent. Int Urogynecol J. 2016;27(8):1255–63.
Google Scholar
Li Y, Zhang QY, Sun BF, et al. Single-cell transcriptome profiling of the vaginal wall in women with severe anterior vaginal prolapse. Nat Commun. 2021;12(1):87.
Google Scholar
Yu X, He L, Lin W, et al. Long-term menopause exacerbates vaginal wall support injury in ovariectomized rats by regulating amino acid synthesis and glycerophospholipid metabolism. Front Endocrinol (Lausanne). 2023;14:1119599.
Google Scholar
Nappi RE, Kokot-Kierepa M. Women’s voices in the menopause: results from an international survey on vaginal atrophy. Maturitas. 2010;67(3):233–8.
Google Scholar
Weber MA, Limpens J, Roovers JP. Assessment of vaginal atrophy: a review. Int Urogynecol J. 2015;26(1):15–28.
Google Scholar
Management of symptomatic vulvovaginal atrophy: 2013 position statement of The North American Menopause Society . Menopause, 2013, 20(9): 888-902; quiz 903-884.
Gebhart J B, Rickard D J, Barrett T J, et al. Expression of estrogen receptor isoforms alpha and beta messenger RNA in vaginal tissue of premenopausal and postmenopausal women . Am J Obstet Gynecol, 2001, 185(6): 1325-1330; discussion 1330-1321.
Vodegel EV, Kastelein AW, Jansen C, et al. The effects of oestrogen on vaginal wound healing: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Neurourol Urodyn. 2022;41(1):115–26.
Google Scholar
Ashcroft GS, Greenwell-Wild T, Horan MA, et al. Topical estrogen accelerates cutaneous wound healing in aged humans associated with an altered inflammatory response. Am J Pathol. 1999;155(4):1137–46.
Google Scholar
Horng H C, Chang W H, Yeh C C, et al. Estrogen Effects on Wound Healing . Int J Mol Sci, 2017, 18(11).
Diedrich CM, Kastelein AW, Verri FM, et al. Effects of topical estrogen therapy on the vaginal microcirculation in women with vulvovaginal atrophy. Neurourol Urodyn. 2019;38(5):1298–304.
Google Scholar
Costagliola A, Liguori G, Nassauw LV. Neuronal control of the vagina in vertebrates: A review. Acta Histochem. 2023;125(1): 151988.
Google Scholar
Denton A S, Maher E J. Interventions for the physical aspects of sexual dysfunction in women following pelvic radiotherapy . Cochrane Database Syst Rev, 2003, 2003(1): Cd003750.
Hofsjö A, Bohm-Starke N, Bergmark K, et al. Sex steroid hormone receptor expression in the vaginal wall in cervical cancer survivors after radiotherapy. Acta Oncol. 2019;58(8):1107–15.
Google Scholar
Buzzaccarini G, Marin L, Noventa M, et al. Hyaluronic acid in vulvar and vaginal administration: evidence from a literature systematic review. Climacteric. 2021;24(6):560–71.
Google Scholar
Liu SB, Liu SL, Gan XL, et al. The effects of hyaluronic acid vaginal gel on the vaginal epithelium of ovariectomized rats. Gynecol Endocrinol. 2015;31(3):208–13.
Google Scholar
Laliscia C, Delishaj D, Fabrini MG, et al. Acute and late vaginal toxicity after adjuvant high-dose-rate vaginal brachytherapy in patients with intermediate risk endometrial cancer: is local therapy with hyaluronic acid of clinical benefit? J Contemp Brachytherapy. 2016;8(6):512–7.
Google Scholar
Delia P, Sansotta G, Pontoriero A, et al. Clinical Evaluation of Low-Molecular-Weight Hyaluronic Acid-Based Treatment on Onset of Acute Side Effects in Women Receiving Adjuvant Radiotherapy after Cervical Surgery: A Randomized Clinical Trial. Oncol Res Treat. 2019;42(4):217–23.
Google Scholar
van Velthoven MJJ, Gudde AN, Struijs F, et al. The Effect of Growth Factors on Vaginal Wound Healing: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis. Tissue Eng Part B Rev. 2023;29(4):429–40.
Google Scholar
Nagata T, Kawano A, Koyama M, et al. Efficacy of Fibroblast Growth Factor on Epithelialization of the Neovagina in Patients with Mayer-Rokitansky-Küster-Hauser Syndrome Who Underwent Vaginoplasty. J Pediatr Adolesc Gynecol. 2017;30(3):400–4.
Google Scholar
Noguchi S, Nakatsuka M, Sugiyama Y, et al. Use of artificial dermis and recombinant basic fibroblast growth factor for creating a neovagina in a patient with Mayer-Rokitansky-Kuster-Hauser syndrome. Hum Reprod. 2004;19(7):1629–32.
Google Scholar
Hom YK, Young P, Thomson AA, et al. Keratinocyte growth factor injected into female mouse neonates stimulates uterine and vaginal epithelial growth. Endocrinology. 1998;139(9):3772–9.
Google Scholar
Masui F, Matsuda M, Mori T. Involvement of keratinocyte growth factor (KGF)-KGF receptor signaling in developmental estrogenization syndrome of mouse vagina. Cell Tissue Res. 2004;318(3):591–8.
Google Scholar
Ceccarelli S, D’Amici S, Vescarelli E, et al. Topical KGF treatment as a therapeutic strategy for vaginal atrophy in a model of ovariectomized mice. J Cell Mol Med. 2014;18(9):1895–907.
Google Scholar
Nelson KG, Takahashi T, Bossert NL, et al. Epidermal growth factor replaces estrogen in the stimulation of female genital-tract growth and differentiation. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1991;88(1):21–5.
Google Scholar
Abramov Y, Hirsch E, Ilievski V, et al. Transforming growth factor β 1 gene expression during vaginal vs cutaneous surgical woundexpression during vaginal vs cutaneous surgical wound healing in the rabbit. Int Urogynecol J. 2013;24(4):671–5.
Google Scholar
Gray K, Bullock B, Dickson R, et al. Potentiation of diethylstilbestrol-induced alterations in the female mouse reproductive tract by transforming growth factor-alpha transgene expression. Mol Carcinog. 1996;17(3):163–73.
Google Scholar
Abramov Y, Hirsch E, Ilievski V, et al. Expression of platelet-derived growth factor-B mRNA during vaginal vs. dermal incisional wound healing in the rabbit . Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol, 2012, 162(2): 216-220.
Wang S, Gao J, Wang M, et al. Anti-inflammatory effect of adipose-derived stem cells in the treatment of pelvic organ prolapse. J Int Med Res. 2019;47(12):6303–14.
Google Scholar
Perino A, Calligaro A, Forlani F, et al. Vulvo-vaginal atrophy: a new treatment modality using thermo-ablative fractional CO2 laser. Maturitas. 2015;80(3):296–301.
Google Scholar
Samuels JB, Garcia MA. Treatment to External Labia and Vaginal Canal With CO2 Laser for Symptoms of Vulvovaginal Atrophy in Postmenopausal Women. Aesthet Surg J. 2019;39(1):83–93.
Google Scholar
Perrone A M, Tesei M, Ferioli M, et al. Results of a Phase I-II Study on Laser Therapy for Vaginal Side Effects after Radiotherapy for Cancer of Uterine Cervix or Endometrium . Cancers (Basel), 2020, 12(6).
Quick AM, Dockter T, Le-Rademacher J, et al. Pilot study of fractional CO(2) laser therapy for genitourinary syndrome of menopause in gynecologic cancer survivors. Maturitas. 2021;144:37–44.
Google Scholar
Arnold MJ, Sadler K, Leli K. Obstetric Lacerations: Prevention and Repair. Am Fam Physician. 2021;103(12):745–52.
Google Scholar
Leeman L, Spearman M, Rogers R. Repair of obstetric perineal lacerations. Am Fam Physician. 2003;68(8):1585–90.
Google Scholar
Merritt DF. Genital trauma in children and adolescents. Clin Obstet Gynecol. 2008;51(2):237–48.
Google Scholar
Gambhir S, Grigorian A, Schubl S, et al. Analysis of non-obstetric vaginal and vulvar trauma: risk factors for operative intervention. Updates Surg. 2019;71(4):735–40.
Google Scholar
Eyk NV, Allen L, Giesbrecht E, et al. Pediatric vulvovaginal disorders: a diagnostic approach and review of the literature. J Obstet Gynaecol Can. 2009;31(9):850–62.
Google Scholar
Quinn BA, Deng X, Sullivan SA, et al. Change in vaginal length and sexual function in women who undergo surgery ± radiation therapy for endometrial cancer. Brachytherapy. 2023;22(3):334–42.
Google Scholar
Bakker RM, ter Kuile MM, Vermeer WM, et al. Sexual rehabilitation after pelvic radiotherapy and vaginal dilator use: consensus using the Delphi method. Int J Gynecol Cancer. 2014;24(8):1499–506.
Google Scholar
Cerentini T M, Schlöttgen J, Viana da Rosa P, et al. Clinical and Psychological Outcomes of the Use of Vaginal Dilators After Gynaecological Brachytherapy: a Randomized Clinical Trial . Adv Ther, 2019, 36(8): 1936-1949.
Matos S R L, Lucas Rocha Cunha M, Podgaec S, et al. Consensus for vaginal stenosis prevention in patients submitted to pelvic radiotherapy . PLoS One, 2019, 14(8): e0221054.
Cullen K, Fergus K, Dasgupta T, et al. From “sex toy” to intrusive imposition: a qualitative examination of women’s experiences with vaginal dilator use following treatment for gynecological cancer. J Sex Med. 2012;9(4):1162–73.
Google Scholar
Liu M, Juravic M, Mazza G, et al. Vaginal Dilators: Issues and Answers. Sex Med Rev. 2021;9(2):212–20.
Google Scholar
Vazquez S, Padilla-Iserte P, Marina T, et al. Creatsas modified vaginoplasty as reconstructive treatment of vaginal stenosis due to vaginal or pelvic radiotherapy. Int J Gynecol Cancer. 2020;30(8):1249.
Google Scholar
Kumar A, Goyal NK, Das SK, et al. Our experience with genitourinary fistulae. Urol Int. 2009;82(4):404–10.
Google Scholar
Serna-Gallegos T, Jeppson PC. Female Pelvic Fistulae. Obstet Gynecol Clin North Am. 2021;48(3):557–70.
Google Scholar
Rogers RG, Jeppson PC. Current Diagnosis and Management of Pelvic Fistulae in Women. Obstet Gynecol. 2016;128(3):635–50.
Google Scholar
Triantafyllidi V E, Mavrogianni D, Kalampalikis A, et al. Identification of Genetic Causes in Mayer-Rokitansky-Küster-Hauser (MRKH) Syndrome: A Systematic Review of the Literature . Children (Basel), 2022, 9(7).
Chen N, Song S, Bao X, et al. Update on Mayer-Rokitansky-Küster-Hauser syndrome. Front Med. 2022;16(6):859–72.
Google Scholar
Selçuk CT, Evsen MS, Ozalp B, et al. Reconstruction of vaginal agenesis with pudendal thigh flaps thinned with liposuction. J Plast Reconstr Aesthet Surg. 2013;66(9):e246-250.
Google Scholar
Zhao M, Li P, Li S, et al. Use of autologous micromucosa graft for vaginoplasty in vaginal agenesis. Ann Plast Surg. 2009;63(6):645–9.
Google Scholar
Zhao XW, Ma JY, Wang YX, et al. Laparoscopic vaginoplasty using a single peritoneal flap: 10 years of experience in the creation of a neovagina in patients with Mayer-Rokitansky-Küster-Hauser syndrome. Fertil Steril. 2015;104(1):241–7.
Google Scholar
Li S, Sun C, Shi B, et al. Laparoscopic vaginoplasty using a sigmoid graft through the umbilical single-incision hybrid transperineal approach: our initial experience. J Laparoendosc Adv Surg Tech A. 2014;24(5):354–8.
Google Scholar
Farzamfar S, Elia E, Richer M, et al. Extracellular Matrix-Based and Electrospun Scaffolding Systems for Vaginal Reconstruction . Bioengineering (Basel), 2023, 10(7).
Zhang Y, Ma Y, Chen J, et al. Mesenchymal stem cell transplantation for vaginal repair in an ovariectomized rhesus macaque model. Stem Cell Res Ther. 2021;12(1):406.
Google Scholar
Mason C, Manzotti E. Regenerative medicine cell therapies: numbers of units manufactured and patients treated between 1988 and 2010. Regen Med. 2010;5(3):307–13.
Google Scholar
Zhang H, Zhang J, Huang X, et al. The Methods and Mechanisms to Differentiate Endothelial-Like Cells and Smooth Muscle Cells from Mesenchymal Stem Cells for Vascularization in Vaginal Reconstruction. Mol Biotechnol. 2018;60(6):396–411.
Google Scholar
Kasap B, Kasap Ş, Vatansever S, et al. Effects of adipose and bone marrow-derived mesenchymal stem cells on vaginal atrophy in a rat menopause model. Gene. 2019;711: 143937.
Google Scholar
Mao M, Li Y, Zhang Y, et al. Human umbilical cord mesenchymal stem cells reconstruct the vaginal wall of ovariectomized Sprague-Dawley rats: implications for pelvic floor reconstruction. Cell Tissue Res. 2021;386(3):571–83.
Google Scholar
Zakrzewski W, Dobrzyński M, Szymonowicz M, et al. Stem cells: past, present, and future. Stem Cell Res Ther. 2019;10(1):68.
Google Scholar
Karateke A, Haliloglu B, Parlak O, et al. Intestinal vaginoplasty: seven years’ experience of a tertiary center. Fertil Steril. 2010;94(6):2312–5.
Google Scholar
Mancuso E, Downey C, Doxford-Hook E, et al. The use of polymeric meshes for pelvic organ prolapse: Current concepts, challenges, and future perspectives. J Biomed Mater Res B Appl Biomater. 2020;108(3):771–89.
Google Scholar
Elneil S, Delanerolle G, Zeng Y, et al. Mesh-associated pain syndrome: predictors for continence and prolapse mesh removal surgery in a single centre. BMC Womens Health. 2024;24(1):585.
Google Scholar
Wu X, Jia Y, Sun X, et al. Tissue engineering in female pelvic floor reconstruction. Eng Life Sci. 2020;20(7):275–86.
Google Scholar
Yang D, Zhang M, Liu K. Tissue engineering to treat pelvic organ prolapse. J Biomater Sci Polym Ed. 2021;32(16):2118–43.
Google Scholar
Caneparo C, Brownell D, Chabaud S, et al. Genitourinary Tissue Engineering: Reconstruction and Research Models . Bioengineering (Basel), 2021, 8(7).
Paul K, Darzi S, McPhee G, et al. 3D bioprinted endometrial stem cells on melt electrospun poly ε-caprolactone mesh for pelvic floor application promote anti-inflammatory responses in mice. Acta Biomater. 2019;97:162–76.
Google Scholar
Wu X, Wang Y, Zhu C, et al. Preclinical animal study and human clinical trial data of co-electrospun poly(L-lactide-co-caprolactone) and fibrinogen mesh for anterior pelvic floor reconstruction. Int J Nanomedicine. 2016;11:389–97.
Google Scholar
Xiao Y, Zhang J, Tian Y, et al. Vaginal reconstruction with a double-sided biomembrane-a preclinical experimental study on large animals . Biomater Sci, 2023.
Hympánová L, Rynkevic R, Román S, et al. Assessment of Electrospun and Ultra-lightweight Polypropylene Meshes in the Sheep Model for Vaginal Surgery. Eur Urol Focus. 2020;6(1):190–8.
Google Scholar
Ye M, Yu L, She Y, et al. Healing effects of a protein scaffold loaded with adipose-derived mesenchymal stem cells on radiation-induced vaginal injury in rats. J Int Med Res. 2020;48(10):300060520958826.
Google Scholar
Chang Y, Sun X, Li Q, et al. Silk fibroin scaffold as a potential choice for female pelvic reconstruction: A study on the biocompatibility in abdominal wall, pelvic, and vagina. Microsc Res Tech. 2017;80(3):291–7.
Google Scholar
Liang R, Knight K, Easley D, et al. Towards rebuilding vaginal support utilizing an extracellular matrix bioscaffold. Acta Biomater. 2017;57:324–33.
Google Scholar
Zhang JK, Du RX, Zhang L, et al. A new material for tissue engineered vagina reconstruction: Acellular porcine vagina matrix. J Biomed Mater Res A. 2017;105(7):1949–59.
Google Scholar
Fan X, Wang Y, Wang Y, et al. Comparison of polypropylene mesh and porcine-derived, cross-linked urinary bladder matrix materials implanted in the rabbit vagina and abdomen. Int Urogynecol J. 2014;25(5):683–9.
Google Scholar
link
:max_bytes(150000):strip_icc()/5-Best-High-Protein-Foods-for-Gut-Health-e20263c85fd149e28d0fe01f0a26d514.jpg "The 5 Best High-Protein Foods for Gut Health")
